7D material projected in cinema - Page 2 - DVXuser.com -- The online community for filmmaking

bwwd · 11-06-2009, 06:10 PM

60p looks kinda like 30 interlaced ,50p looks like 25 interlaced ,it just looks so amateur looking ,i cant even describe how i hate this look and smoothness... yuck.

Ilinpelin · 11-07-2009, 12:41 AM

I am working on an internationally funded observational documentary, which is aimed at the festival circuit amongst others, so it matters to us a lot how it would look there. It would be nice if anyone has had the chance to look at such material in cinema and seriously share their experience. thanks.

SPZ · 11-07-2009, 05:59 AM

I've not seen the 7D, but I've seen the 5D markII. No problems whatsoever- similar to a Sony F23. Since the 7D resolves close to the 5D and the HVX, which I also saw in cinema projection looking great, I would assume there's no problem with the 7D.

Ilinpelin · 11-07-2009, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPZ

I've not seen the 7D, but I've seen the 5D markII. No problems whatsoever- similar to a Sony F23. Since the 7D resolves close to the 5D and the HVX, which I also saw in cinema projection looking great, I would assume there's no problem with the 7D.

Thanks Sergio. That sounds very positive.

Best,

Ilian

Taylor Rudd · 11-07-2009, 07:25 AM

Similar to the F23? Only if you shoot like Michael Mann! The F23 is far, far, far, far superior. What it lacks in DOF characteristics, it makes up for with everything else.

I've seen 5D footage blown up before, but they were static shots. It'll look good if the footage is shot well. Unfortunately the big screen will also reveal these cameras' flaws in a bigger way

11-07-2009, 12:41 AM	#12
Ilinpelin Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Oxford, UK / Sofia, Bulgaria Posts: 17	I am working on an internationally funded observational documentary, which is aimed at the festival circuit amongst others, so it matters to us a lot how it would look there. It would be nice if anyone has had the chance to look at such material in cinema and seriously share their experience. thanks. Last edited by Ilinpelin; 11-07-2009 at 12:51 AM.

11-07-2009, 05:59 AM	#13
SPZ Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Macau Posts: 2,438	I've not seen the 7D, but I've seen the 5D markII. No problems whatsoever- similar to a Sony F23. Since the 7D resolves close to the 5D and the HVX, which I also saw in cinema projection looking great, I would assume there's no problem with the 7D. __________________ Sérgio Perez Macanese Director

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-06-2009, 06:10 PM	#11
bwwd Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 807	60p looks kinda like 30 interlaced ,50p looks like 25 interlaced ,it just looks so amateur looking ,i cant even describe how i hate this look and smoothness... yuck.

11-07-2009, 07:25 AM	#15
Taylor Rudd Senior Member Join Date: Aug 1984 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 946	Similar to the F23? Only if you shoot like Michael Mann! The F23 is far, far, far, far superior. What it lacks in DOF characteristics, it makes up for with everything else. I've seen 5D footage blown up before, but they were static shots. It'll look good if the footage is shot well. Unfortunately the big screen will also reveal these cameras' flaws in a bigger way